Non-extradition countries don’t have extradition treaties with certain countries, meaning they won’t send individuals back to face legal charges or persecution in another nation.

With that said, what does extradition mean? Extradition is the legal process where one country hands over a person to another country to face charges or serve a sentence for a crime. It usually depends on treaties between countries and requires that the crime is recognized in both countries. The person must also receive a fair trial in the requesting country.

However, these treaties are not always guaranteed; governments can disregard them when pressured. This guide will take you through non-extradition countries to consider in 2024, highlighting some of the factors that make these countries noteworthy when looking for the best countries for extradition agreements. We will cover: 

WEBINAR: Plan B: Moving Abroad for Americans
Join us on November 25 at 12:00 PM (CST)

REGISTER NOW Arrow Icon

What are non-extradition countries?

non extradition countries extradition agreements legal frameworks international law international relations human rights country may the best insurance for nomads north korea saudi arabia safe haven vatican city five star human rights list of countries many countries drug trafficking foreign country lay low law enforcement agencies gulf states non extradition countries middle east list of countries ukraine and moldova many nomads two countries second country one country middle east treaty with the us south korea justice system dual criminality sign extradition treaties own country extradite criminals country may western nations extradition laws such countries formal agreements other western nations following countries human rights international relations international law national security agency non extradition countries legal frameworks human rights abuses extradition countries foreign government extradition agreements sign extradition treaties other nations own country extradition requests such treaties treaties with the us non extradition countries non extradition countries Non-extradition countries are nations that do not have formal extradition treaties with certain other countries, meaning they are not obligated to hand over individuals accused or convicted of crimes to those requesting nations.

These treaties are legal agreements that facilitate the transfer of fugitives across borders to face justice in the requesting country.

Countries without such treaties might refuse extradition for various reasons, including political considerations, differing legal systems, or concerns about human rights abuses in the requesting country. For example, a country may refuse to extradite someone if they face the death penalty, torture, or unfair trials.

What are non-extradition treaties?

Non-extradition treaties are agreements between countries that outline the terms under which one country may refuse to surrender a person to another country for criminal prosecution or punishment. Key features of these treaties often include:

  • Exclusion of certain crimes: Some crimes, like political offenses or acts against human rights, are often excluded from extradition agreements.
  • Dual criminality principle: The crime must be illegal in both countries for extradition.
  • Nationality exemption: Many treaties prevent the extradition of a country’s own nationals.
  • Requirement for fair trials: Extradition may depend on assurances that the individual will receive a fair trial, avoiding risks like torture or the death penalty.
  • Conditions for extradition: Strict procedures must be followed when processing extradition requests.

Why some countries don’t honor extradition treaties?

Non-extradition countries can sometimes become havens for those seeking to avoid legal consequences in their home countries. However, residing in a non-extradition country does not guarantee complete immunity from prosecution, as local laws may still apply, and international diplomatic pressures can influence decisions.

Additionally, some countries without formal treaties may still cooperate on a case-by-case basis through diplomatic channels. Non-extradition treaties, while providing a certain degree of protection, may not be foolproof. It is essential to understand that:

  • Non-extradition treaties are not consistently recognized or honored by foreign governments, making them potentially unreliable as a complete safeguard against extradition.
  • The recognition and enforcement of non-extradition treaties depend on the political relationship and diplomatic ties between the countries involved.
  • Some governments may overlook or violate these agreements under certain circumstances, such as political pressure, national security concerns, or significant diplomatic events.
  • It is crucial for individuals considering non-extradition countries to thoroughly research the specific country’s track record in honoring these non-extradition treaties and consult legal professionals for a comprehensive understanding of the risks involved.
  • Relying solely on countries with no extradition treaties can be risky, and additional measures should be taken to ensure personal safety and avoid legal complications, such as maintaining a low profile, abiding by laws, and seeking advice from experts in international legislation.

8 Best Non-Extradition Countries

For countries to be considered the best non-extraditions countries, these are factors that contribute to their attractiveness as safe havens: 

  • Stable Legal Systems
  • Absence of Extradition Treaties
  • Political Neutrality
  • Strong Privacy Laws

1. United States

The US has a vast network of extradition treaties with over 100 countries. Its comprehensive legal framework and active pursuit of international fugitives make it a central player in global extradition efforts. The US also has mechanisms for handling extradition requests with significant attention to legal procedures and human rights protections.

2. United Kingdom

The UK is another country considered the best non-extradition country because it has extensive extradition agreements with numerous countries, facilitated by its membership in international bodies such as the European Union (before Brexit) and the Council of Europe. Its legal system provides robust legal procedures for extradition and emphasizes judicial oversight.

3. Canada

Canada maintains many extradition treaties, supporting global law enforcement collaboration. Its legal system requires a thorough review process for extradition requests under each official extradition treaty, ensuring fairness and adherence to international standards.

4. Australia

Australia is active in international extradition, maintaining extensive extradition treaties with many countries. Its extradition processes are supported by a legal system that ensures detailed judicial reviews and protections for those facing extradition. In cases involving countries without extradition agreements, Australia carefully assesses the legal consequences to uphold its legal standards and human rights commitments.

5. Germany

Germany’s extensive network of extradition treaties reflects its commitment to international legal cooperation. Its legal framework includes strong procedural safeguards and human rights considerations, ensuring a fair extradition process. However, for those in non-extradition countries, the role of law enforcement agencies and diplomatic relations can still influence the extradition process and international legal dynamics.

6. Netherlands

The Netherlands is a critical player in international extradition, with agreements covering numerous countries. It is known for its adherence to international legal standards and human rights protections in the extradition process.

7. France

France has a comprehensive network of extradition treaties with many countries. Its legal system supports international cooperation and has mechanisms for handling extradition requests, focusing on human rights and judicial fairness. For individuals in non-extradition countries, the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies and diplomatic relations can still impact the extradition process and international legal interactions.

8. Sweden

Sweden maintains extensive extradition treaties with various countries and is known for its rigorous extradition processes. Its legal system emphasizes fairness and human rights when handling extradition requests, which contributes to its strong reputation in global law enforcement. In cases involving countries without extradition agreements, Sweden carefully evaluates the legal consequences to ensure decisions align with its principles of justice and human rights.

9 Countries with No Extradition Treaty with the US

non extradition countries non extradition extradition countries human rights international law human rights saudi arabia safe haven five star foreign country wealthiest countries uk citizens non extradition famous cases refuse extradition request extradition treaty means south east asia extradition countries diplomatic relations deposed prime minister other nations uk citizens extradite criminals air conditioned shopping malls many nomads two countries second country one country list of countries ukraine and moldova many nomads two countries second country one country middle east diplomatic relations human rights international law non extradition country other nations human rights extradition countries non extradition non extradition countries non extradition countries non extradition countries non extradition countries non extradition countries non extradition countriesThe United States is often at the center of discussions about non-extradition countries because of its broad extradition treaties and strict enforcement of laws against crimes like financial fraud and tax evasion. With laws like FATCA and high-profile cases, some individuals look for countries without extradition agreements to avoid legal accountability.

Therefore, for individuals looking to avoid extradition to the United States through securing residency in countries with extradition to the US in 2024, the following are countries without extradition:

1. Brunei

A small sovereign state on the island of Borneo, Brunei does not have an extradition agreement with the US. This Southeast Asian nation offers a peaceful environment known for its rich cultural heritage and beautiful landscapes.

2. Russia

Russia and its neighbor China are significant global powers and widely recognized countries that do not have an extradition agreement with the US. These countries have complex legal systems and strict control over extradition processes, making it challenging for the US government to secure the transfer of individuals wanted for legal proceedings.

3. Gulf States

Several Gulf States, including the UAE, Qatar, and Bahrain, do not have a bilateral extradition treaty with the United States. These countries offer a luxurious lifestyle, modern infrastructure, and opportunities for business and investment. However, it is important to note that political considerations and diplomatic negotiations can influence extradition verdicts in the Gulf States.

4. Montenegro

Montenegro, a picturesque Balkan country, has no extradition agreement with the United States. Known for its stunning coastline along the Adriatic Sea, Montenegro offers a blend of historical charm and natural beauty, making it an attractive destination for those seeking refuge.

5. Ukraine and Moldova

Neither Ukraine nor Moldova, Eastern European countries, have extradition treaties with the United States. These nations provide a mix of diverse cultures, rich histories, and scenic landscapes. However, it is essential to consider the political situation and regional dynamics when contemplating these destinations. The support the Ukrainian government currently receives from the US government may affect extradition treaties and policies.

6. Vietnam

Vietnam and other countries like Cambodia and Mongolia are Southeast Asian nations without extradition treaties with the US. Vietnam offers a captivating blend of bustling cities and serene landscapes, while Cambodia boasts ancient temples and a unique cultural experience. Mongolia, known for its vast steppes and nomadic traditions, offers a peaceful and remote escape from legal complications.

7. Maldives, Vanuatu, Tunisia

The Maldives, Vanuatu, and Tunisia are diverse countries without treaties with the United States. The Maldives is renowned for its idyllic beaches and luxury resorts, while Tunisia, located in North Africa, offers a mix of historical sites, vibrant culture, and Mediterranean charm. Participation in the Vanuatu citizenship by investment program is open to US citizens, and it’s worth noting that Vanuatu maintains no extradition treaty with the United States.

8. Ecuador

Ecuador and its neighbor Venezuela are the only South American countries with no extradition treaty with the US. While Venezuela is amid an economic and political crisis, Ecuador maintains relative stability and has many visa options for obtaining a residence permit.

9. Ethiopia

Ethiopia and other countries like Botswana and Uganda are African countries that do not have extradition treaties with the United States. These are also some of the few countries with no extradition treaty with the US that speak English.

Ethiopia is known for its ancient civilization and breathtaking landscapes, while Botswana offers abundant wildlife and stunning national parks. Uganda, with its diverse wildlife and natural wonders, provides a mix of adventure and cultural exploration.

Please note that the absence of an extradition treaty does not guarantee absolute immunity from extradition demands, as political variables and diplomatic discussions can influence extradition decisions. Additionally, it is crucial to understand these countries’ local legal systems and cultural norms when considering them as potential safe havens.

Countries With and Without Extradition Treaties With Others

African Countries

Extradition Treaties

Algeria

No

Angola

No

Benin

No

Botswana

No

Burkina Faso

No

Burundi

No

Cabo Verde

Yes

Cameroon

No

Central African Republic

No

Chad

No

Comoros

No

Congo

Yes

Democratic Republic of the Congo

No

Djibouti

No

Egypt

Yes

Equatorial Guinea

No

Eritrea

No

Eswatini

Yes

Ethiopia

No

Gabon

No

Ghana

Yes

Guinea

No

Guinea-Bissau

No

Ivory Coast

No

Kenya

Yes

Lesotho

Yes

Liberia

Yes

Libya

No

Madagascar

No

Malawi

Yes

Mali

No

Mauritania

No

Morocco

No

Mozambique

No

Namibia

No

Niger

No

Nigeria

Yes

Rwanda

No

Senegal

No

Seychelles

Yes

Sierra Leone

Yes

Somalia

No

Somaliland

Yes

South Africa

Yes

South Sudan

No

Sudan

No

São Tomé and Príncipe

No

Tanzania

Yes

The Gambia

Yes

Togo

No

Tunisia

No

Uganda

No

Western Sahara

No

Zambia

Yes

Zimbabwe

Yes

European Countries

Extratidion Treaties

Albania

Yes

Andorra

No

Armenia

No

Austria

Yes

Azerbaijan

No

Belarus

No

Belgium

Yes

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Yes

Bulgaria

Yes

Croatia

Yes

Cyprus

No

Czech Republic

Yes

Denmark

Yes

Estonia

Yes

Finland

Yes

France

Yes

Georgia

No

Germany

Yes

Greece

Yes

Hungary

Yes

Iceland

Yes

Ireland

Yes

Italy

Yes

Kosovo

No

Latvia

Yes

Liechtenstein

Yes

Lithuania

Yes

Luxembourg

Yes

Macedonia

No

Malta

Yes

Moldova

No

Monaco

Yes

Montenegro

Yes

Netherlands

Yes

Norway

Yes

Poland

Yes

Portugal

Yes

Romania

Yes

San Marino

Yes

Serbia

Yes

Slovakia

Yes

Slovenia

Yes

Spain

Yes

Sweden

Yes

Switzerland

Yes

Turkey

Yes

Ukraine

No

United Kingdom

Yes

Vatican City

No

Unlock global opportunities through citizenship by investment

Learn More Arrow Icon

American Countries

Extradition Treaties

Antigua and Barbuda

Yes

Barbados

Yes

Belize

Yes

Bolivia

Yes

Brazil

Yes

Canada

Yes

Chile

Yes

Colombia

Yes

Costa Rica

Yes

Cuba

No

Dominica

Yes

Dominican Republic

Yes

Ecuador

Yes

El Salvador

Yes

Grenada

Yes

Guatemala

Yes

Guyana

Yes

Haiti

Yes

Honduras

Yes

Jamaica

Yes

Mexico

Yes

Nicaragua

Yes

Panama

Yes

Paraguay

Yes

Peru

Yes

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Yes

Saint Lucia

Yes

Saint Martin

No

Saint Pierre and Miquelon

No

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Yes

Suriname

Yes

The Bahamas

Yes

Trinidad and Tobago

Yes

Unites States

Yes

Uruguay

Yes

Venezuela

Yes

Asian Countries

Extradition Treaties

Afghanistan

No

Argentina

Yes

Bahrain

No

Bangladesh

No

Bhutan

No

Brunei

No

Cambodia

No

China

No

East Timor

No

Hong Kong

Yes

India

Yes

Indonesia

No

Iran

No

Iraq

Yes

Israel

Yes

Japan

Yes

Jordan

Yes

Kazakhstan

No

Kuwait

No

Kyrgyzstan

No

Laos

No

Lebanon

No

Malaysia

Yes

Maldives

No

Mauritius

Yes

Mongolia

No

Myanmar

Yes

Nepal

No

North Korea

No

Oman

No

Pakistan

Yes

Palestine

No

Philippines

Yes

Qatar

No

Russia

No

Saudi Arabia

No

Siachen Glacier

No

Singapore

Yes

Solomon Islands

No

South Korea

Yes

Sri Lanka

Yes

Syria

No

Taiwan

No

Tajikistan

No

Thailand

Yes

Turkmenistan

No

United Arab Emirates

No

Uzbekistan

No

Vietnam

No

Yemen

No

Oceanian/Pacific Countries

Extradition Treaties

Australia

Yes

Fiji

Yes

Marshall Islands

Yes

Micronesia

Yes

Nauru

Yes

New Zealand

Yes

Palau

Yes

Papua New Guinea

Yes

Samoa

No

Solomon Islands

Yes

Tonga

Yes

Vanuatu

No

Non-Extradition Countries versus Countries with No Diplomatic Ties

It is essential to distinguish between non-extradition countries and countries without diplomatic ties. While both categories provide potential safeguards against extradition, the underlying dynamics differ significantly:

Non-Extradition Countries

Countries with No Diplomatic Ties

Have specific agreements with law enforcement agencies that legally prevent individuals’ transfer through extradition, such as for those granted asylum due to the threat of political persecution.

Lack of formal political relations with particular countries does not automatically imply refusal of extradition requests.

Provide a higher level of protection against extradition due to established legal frameworks explicitly prohibiting it.

Consider calls for extradition on a case-by-case basis, considering factors such as political negotiations, international pressure, or bilateral agreements with other nations.

Generally, it offers a more reliable safeguard against potential extradition as the legal framework is explicitly designed to prevent it.

Calls for extradition may still be considered depending on the circumstances and the requesting country’s policies despite the absence of formal diplomatic relations.

It is advisable for individuals seeking to avoid extradition to focus on countries with non-extradition agreements for more reliable protection.

Individuals should exercise caution and thoroughly research the specific country’s extradition policies, despite the absence of diplomatic ties, as various factors can still influence extradition decisions.

Difference Between Countries Having No Extradition Treaty and Not Extraditing

Understanding the difference between countries without an extradition treaty and those that choose not to extradite is crucial:

Having No Extradition Treaty

Not Extraditing

Refers to countries that have not entered into a more formal treaty or agreement with another country regarding extradition.

Refers to a country’s decision not to extradite individuals despite being the only country with an extradition treaty.

Does not establish a legal obligation to extradite individuals, but the extradition process can still occur based on diplomatic discussions or political considerations.

Reflects a discretionary approach by the country, where requests for extradition are evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

The lack of an extradition treaty may provide a certain level of protection against extradition proceedings, but it does not guarantee immunity from extradition requests.

The decision not to extradite can be influenced by factors such as the severity of the crime, human rights concerns, legal consequences, political implications, or national interests.

Examples include countries like Russia, China, Brunei, Montenegro, Ukraine, Moldova, Vietnam, Cambodia, Mongolia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Ethiopia, Botswana, and Uganda.

Examples include countries like Switzerland, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom, among other countries, which may refuse extradition requests in specific cases based on legal, humanitarian, or political reasons.

Individuals should be aware that the absence of an extradition treaty does not necessarily guarantee safety from extradition, as diplomatic negotiations and political factors can still lead to extradition.

Individuals should understand that the decision not to extradite is discretionary and can vary depending on the circumstances and considerations of the foreign country being involved.

Explore Golden Visa programs: a path to residency and citizenship

Click Here Arrow Icon

Famous Cases of Extradition and Non-Extradition

Extradition cases involving high-profile individuals have often made headlines and shed light on the complexities of international law and diplomatic relations. Here are some notable cases of extradition and non-extradition:

Extradition

  • Julian Assange: The founder of WikiLeaks was facing requests for extradition to the United States for charges related to leaking classified information. Assange remained in London’s Belmarsh Prison until his release to his native Australia in 2024. He was fighting extradition to the United States to face allegations of espionage and conspiring to hack into the Pentagon’s computer network.
  • Roman Polanski: Film director Roman Polanski faced requests for extradition from the United States for charges of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor. Despite various attempts by the US authorities, Polanski has managed to prevent extradition by residing in countries that do not have bilateral extradition agreements with the US, such as France and Poland.
  • Mehmet Atilla: Mehmet Hakan Atilla, a Turkish banker, was deported from the United States to Turkey in 2018. He faced charges related to a scheme to evade US sanctions against Iran.

Non-extradition

  • Edward Snowden: Former US National Security Agency (NSA) contractor Edward Snowden exposed classified information about global surveillance programs. To stop extradition to the United States, Snowden sought asylum in Russia, a country that does not have an extradition agreement with the US. As of the latest information available, he remains in Russia.
  • Carlos Ghosn: Carlos Ghosn, the former chairman of the Nissan-Renault-Mitsubishi alliance, faced charges of financial misconduct in Japan. In a dramatic escape, Ghosn fled to Lebanon, which does not have an extradition agreement with Japan. He continues to reside in Lebanon, beyond the reach of Japanese authorities.
  • Kim Dotcom: Internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom, the founder of the file-sharing website Megaupload, faced calls for extradition from the United States on copyright infringement and racketeering charges. However, Dotcom fought the extradition in New Zealand courts and ultimately avoided extradition.

These cases highlight the intricate legal battles, diplomatic discussions, and political considerations involved in extradition matters. It is important to note that decisions on extradition can vary depending on the specific circumstances, the countries involved, and the legal frameworks in place.

Seeking refuge in a non-extradition country does not guarantee absolute protection, as political variables and diplomatic relations can change over time, potentially impacting decisions on extradition.

How Can Global Citizen Solutions Help You?

Global Citizen Solutions is a boutique migration consultancy firm with years of experience delivering bespoke residence and citizenship by investment solutions for international families. With offices worldwide and an experienced, hands-on team, we have helped hundreds of clients worldwide acquire citizenship, residence visas, or homes while diversifying their portfolios with robust investments. 

We guide you from start to finish, taking you beyond your citizenship or residency by investment application. 

Frequently Asked Questions about Without Non-Extradition Countries

Which countries can you not be extradited?

Some countries without extradition treaties include Russia, China, Brunei, Montenegro, Ukraine, Moldova, Vietnam, Cambodia, Mongolia, Qatar, Bahrain, Ethiopia, Botswana, and Uganda.

Why do some countries have no official extradition treaty?

Governments may choose not to have extradition treaties for various reasons, including concerns about the fairness of the legal system of the country, political considerations, protection of their own citizens, or disagreement with the death penalty.

What is the safest country if you want to prevent extradition?

Some countries where you may have a lower risk of extradition include Russia, China, Brunei, Montenegro, Ukraine, Moldova, Vietnam, Cambodia, Mongolia, the UAE, Qatar, Bahrain, Ethiopia, Botswana, and Uganda.

What is the best country if you want to prevent extradition?

The UAE is considered one of the best countries to prevent extradition due to its robust legal system, stringent privacy laws, and the absence of existing extradition treaties with certain countries, such as the US. The UAE has a reputation for upholding the rule of law and ensuring a fair judicial process.

Furthermore, the UAE is characterized by geopolitical stability and a diplomatic approach that avoids entanglement in major political disputes. This absence of political conflicts contributes to the country’s overall security and may mitigate the likelihood of requests for extradition being influenced by external political pressures.

Does Belize extradite to the US?

Yes, Belize has an extradition treaty with the United States. This means that Belize can extradite people to the United States to face criminal charges if requested by the US government and if the extradition request meets the requirements outlined in the treaty and Belizean law.

Does Dubai extradite to the US?

Yes, Dubai, as part of the UAE, has extradition treaties with several countries, including the United States.

Does Switzerland extradite to the US?

Yes, Switzerland has extradition treaties with numerous countries, including the United States. This means that Switzerland can extradite people to the United States to face criminal charges if requested by the US government and if the extradition request meets the requirements outlined in the treaty and Swiss law.

What countries have no extradition to UK?

The UK does not have formal extradition treaties with countries like North Korea, Somalia, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Syria, Algeria, Libya, and Iraq.

Are non-extradition countries safe for foreigners?

Non-extradition countries are not inherently safe for foreigners. While they may avoid extradition, local laws, political instability, corruption, and case-by-case cooperation with other nations can pose significant risks.

Can you obtain citizenship in a non-extradition country?

Yes, you can obtain citizenship in a non-extradition country, but the process depends on the specific country’s laws and requirements. Some non-extradition countries offer citizenship through investment, naturalization, marriage, or descent. However, each country has its own criteria and due diligence processes, especially for foreigners seeking citizenship.

Are non-extradition countries safe for foreigners?

Non-extradition countries are not inherently safe for foreigners. While they may offer some protection from being extradited to another country, they still pose risks such as strict local laws, political instability, and potential cooperation with other nations on a case-by-case basis. It is important to consider these factors when evaluating safety in non-extradition countries.

Caribbean Citizenship by Investment Comparison Guide
More Info arrow icon
14 Countries with Immigrant Investor Programs in 2024
More Info arrow icon
Golden Visas: Discover the Best Golden Visa Countries
More Info arrow icon
Th 10 Best Places for Expats to Live in 2024
More Info arrow icon